The Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) has been given the Extended
Producer Responsibility (EPR) authorization beneath the
new e-waste regulations—diverting it from the State Pollution
Boards—the Environment Ministry has told a Parliamentary panel. The
Ministry stated this in its reply to the Committee of
Subordinate Legislation 2016–17 whose 23rd report on movement taken via the government on pointers of
its 15th record of the committee on e-waste control. The
committee had earlier cited that poor overall
performance in submission of annual returns via State Pollution
Control Boards (SPCBs) has been derailing the whole system of
collecting facts and tracking implementation of the
e-waste rules in an effective manner.
It had also in its
recommendation requested the Environment Ministry to “reign in”
erring state forums and ensure strict compliance of
the regulations. The EPR Consultancy is
a policy method underneath which producers are given
a good sized responsibility—financial or physical—for
the treatment or disposal of post-customer merchandise.
“Poor overall performance of SPCBs has been underneath review on
the grounds that long under all of the Waste Management
Rules best with appreciate to the submission of annual
return but additionally their function in
regulation, monitoring and making
sure vital compliance,” the Ministry said in
its reply. “Accordingly inside the amended new E-Waste Rules
2016, the EPR authorization has been made Central Pollution Control
Board’s responsibility with pan India implementation, diverting from
the duty of SPCBs, thus lowering the weight of SPCBs
significantly,” the Ministry added.
It stated the position of
State Boards underneath the guidelines is
now restricted to issuance of authorization to dismantles, giving
them ample scope of specializing in tracking and
compliance which encompass well timed submission of annual
reports. E-Waste (Management) Rules, 2016 and Guidelines through CPCB
states that Producers/producers/ distributors/Bulk Consumers of the
goods are responsible and accountable to make
sure its whole disposal at the give up of its life cycle.
R2 PROMISE – Responsible Recycling Producer Responsibility Organization for
Management, Information & Support for E-waste disposal.
We underwrite the implementation of
EPR scheme on behalf of the producers.
We provide manufacturers, services essential to
fulfill their statutory, criminal and
social responsibilities for E-waste recycling. R2 PROMISE can
implement entire EPR addressing numerous profiles
defined below new rules by way of helping to
draw up appropriate processes/plans, implement, music and file.
Some of the services we provide are:
- EPR Authorization with EPR planning, Documentation and Approval • Compliance Services as in line with the brand new e-waste management guidelines.
- EPR framework design & Implementation • End to end e-waste control from collection to recycling of waste • Documentation for statutory, criminal and social responsibilities & filling • In the sector of waste management, prolonged producer duty (EPR) is a strategy to add all of the environmental expenses related to a product at some point of the product lifestyles cycle to the market fee of that product.[1] Extended manufacturer obligation legislation is a driving force at the back of the adoption of re-manufacturing initiatives because it “specializes in the cease-of-use remedy of consumer products and has the primary intention to increase the amount and degree of product recovery and to limit the environmental impact of waste materials”.
- The concept was first formally introduced in Sweden through Thomas Individualist during a 1990 record to the Swedish Ministry of the Environment. In subsequent reports prepared for the Ministry, the subsequent definition emerged: “[EPR] is an environmental protection approach to achieve an environmental objective of a decreased overall environmental impact of a product, by making the producer of the product responsible for the whole existence-cycle of the product and specially for the take-lower back, recycling and very last disposal EPR makes use of monetary incentives to encourage manufacturers to design environmentally friendly products via holding manufacturers answerable for the costs of coping with their merchandise at quit of lifestyles.
This policy approach differs
from product stewardship, which
shares responsibility throughout the chain of custody of a
product,[5] in that it attempts to relieve local governments of
the charges of dealing with positive priority products by requiring manufacturers to
internalize the price of recycling inside
the product charge. EPR is primarily based on
the precept that producers (usually logo owners)
have the best manipulate over
product design and advertising and feature the greatest capacity and duty to lessen toxicity
and waste. EPR may additionally take the shape of a reuse,
buyback, or recycling program. The producer might
also also select to delegate
this responsibility to a 3rd party, a so-referred to
as producer obligation organization (PRO), that’s paid by
means of the producer for used-product management. In this
way, EPR shifts the requirement for
waste management from government to nonpublic industry,
obliging manufacturers, importers
