Wednesday, March 25, 2020

How do I start a company in the USA from India?

Founding a company in the USA? I prefer to leave that to large companies. This is how many a medium-sized company may think.
Establishing a company in the United States is not only sensible for huge corporations: It is much easier to implement than most think, brings the company very close to an important sales market and can also significantly simplify many activities around the company foundation.

Why found a company in the United States?

For many entrepreneurs, the USA belongs to the offshore markets, i.e. the markets with particularly favorable conditions for companies: The establishment of a company is relatively easy, the most important positions in the company can sometimes be filled by a single person, the state does not demand too many lots of taxes.
Therefore, founding a company in the United States is not only suitable for plans to dive into the US market. With a so-called apostles (a certificate), your US company can also operate in Asian.
In addition, as the owner of an offshore corporation (Incorporation = US-American: company) you can remain largely anonymous in Florida, for example, so that a new start on a legal and healthy basis is simplified even after bankruptcy in Indian. And you do not have to provide any proof of share capital to found a US corporation in some US state, and you are practically not personally liable for any outstanding debts in your company.
Even more advantages? You can capitalize the corporation, that is, convert shares into money. And at some point you can pass the company on to your heirs without having to pay inheritance tax.

What exactly is a US corporation?

A US corporation is the most common type of company used to start a business in the United States and it has a good reputation. A US corporation is the American variant of a public limited company.
However, while the establishment of an India stock corporation is subject to numerous conditions, the establishment of a corporation is relatively simple and can be carried out by any natural or legal person. The management of a US corporation consists of the so-called “Board of Directors” and the “Officers”; for example, the same person can be a director and officer of a US corporation in Florida.
Often, $ 100 is sufficient as the official starting capital for the company foundation. As an alternative to founding a company in the USA, there is the so-called Limited Liability CompanyLinks to an external site. (LLC), which has more similarities to the India GmbH.

How does a company start up in the USA?

Agencies usually support the company founders. In any case, you need a registered agent to contact the United States if you want to start a corporation. He must be present in the US state that you selected to start your company.
Such a registered agent will be gladly provided to you by reputable agencies for founding a company in the US offshore market. An official postal address is also provided in the USA for your correspondence, which the founding agency will be happy to forward to your home address. It is even possible to be reached directly by phone on the US number, even if you are located in Asia.

Thursday, March 19, 2020

Waste, hazardous waste and Non waste: what are the differences?


In the common imagination, waste is imagined as a Unit com, to be disposed of by the most appropriate tools and measures. In fact, if you pause for a moment to think, even to non-professionals of the trade it will become clear that there are different differences between the wastes itself. And it is precisely this diversity that allows us to classify them according to specific rules and to dispose of them in the most suitable way.

Waste

A waste is any substance or object which the holder discards or has the intention or obligation to discard. The Ministry of the Environment classifies waste into two main categories:

1.      Urban waste
2.      Special waste

The first ones correspond to domestic waste, to waste that lies on public roads and, finally, to vegetable experts from public or private areas. Special waste, on the other hand, is all that produced as a result of commercial and industrial activities, vehicles to be scrapped, medical waste, obsolete or deteriorated machinery and, finally, the sludge produced by water purification.


Both municipal and special waste are in turn divided into hazardous waste and non-hazardous waste. As the same definition suggests, non-hazardous waste is "harmless", insofar as it does not contain substances that are potentially harmful to man and the environment (or contain in low quantities). On the contrary, according to their own terminology, hazardous waste is waste that can have a negative and sometimes catastrophic impact on the ecosystem, also affecting human health.
When it is established that a particular commodity, substance or product meets the definition of waste, it is mandatory:

Record the quantity produced in the waste register within a maximum of 10 days
Dispose of the waste for 3 to 12 months (in the latter case only if the quantity is less than 30 cubic meters, including a maximum of 10 of hazardous waste).

And now that we understand what it is, let's get more specific, by examining a particular sub-category of waste, that is, hazardous waste.

Hazardous waste

Both municipal and special waste exist hazardous waste. In the first case it is, for example, alkaline batteries or expired medicines, which contain so-called "dangerous" substances; in the second, waste deriving from production activities, from medical and veterinary research to oil refining or tanning and textile production.

Asian Waste Code. Consisting of 6 digits, of which the first pair defines the activity of origin, the second identifies the single process of the generating activity and the third identifies the single type of waste, the code is the main tool for classifying waste. In other words, the universal language to standardize waste and, therefore, to be able to manage it correctly.


Waste in IDMG (International Maritime Dangerous Goods)

The Indian Agreement for the Transport of Dangerous Goods (IDMG) is a Asian document signed in 1968 between all the UN countries, the aim of which is to standardize the safety standards for the transport of dangerous goods and substances by road. Therefore, IDMG waste is all waste (hazardous and non-hazardous) which, due to its characteristics, is classified as dangerous for transport purposes according to Asian regulations.

The legal representative of the company whose business involves transport of dangerous goods by road, including IDMG assailable waste, or packaging, loading, filling or unloading operations connected with such transport, is required, except in special cases, to appoint a safety consultant (or more), who, among the various functions, has the task of advising and verifying that all the procedures conning the transport and loading and unloading operations of dangerous goods are carried out in full compliance with current legislation . When they are offered to transport dangerous goods that must be disposed of, if they are also classified as hazardous waste, it will be necessary to integrate the labeling required by the IDMG the hazardous waste label and non-hazardous. In the case of non-hazardous waste, it will be necessary to integrate the IDMG labeling. It is important to remember that in the case Hazardous Waste Management Authorization for transport purposes, it will also be mandatory to comply with all requests regarding the correct packaging.

As we have seen, the wastes are not all the same and those classified according to the non-hazardous can still fall into the category of IDMG waste. The important thing, as always, is that the personnel working in the supply chain receive adequate training to best perform their task.

Thursday, March 5, 2020

What Can You Do About Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Right Now

The Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) has been given the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) authorization beneath the new e-waste regulations—diverting it from the State Pollution Boards—the Environment Ministry has told a Parliamentary panel. The Ministry stated this in its reply to the Committee of Subordinate Legislation 2016–17 whose 23rd report on movement taken via the government on pointers of its 15th record of the committee on e-waste control. The committee had earlier cited that poor overall performance in submission of annual returns via State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) has been derailing the whole system of collecting facts and tracking implementation of the e-waste rules in an effective manner.

It had also in its recommendation requested the Environment Ministry to “reign in” erring state forums and ensure strict compliance of the regulations. The EPR Consultancy is a policy method underneath which producers are given a good sized responsibility—financial or physical—for the treatment or disposal of post-customer merchandise. “Poor overall performance of SPCBs has been underneath review on the grounds that long under all of the Waste Management Rules best with appreciate to the submission of annual return but additionally their function in regulation, monitoring and making sure vital compliance,” the Ministry said in its reply. “Accordingly inside the amended new E-Waste Rules 2016, the EPR authorization has been made Central Pollution Control Board’s responsibility with pan India implementation, diverting from the duty of SPCBs, thus lowering the weight of SPCBs significantly,” the Ministry added.
It stated the position of State Boards underneath the guidelines is now restricted to issuance of authorization to dismantles, giving them ample scope of specializing in tracking and compliance which encompass well timed submission of annual reports. E-Waste (Management) Rules, 2016 and Guidelines through CPCB states that Producers/producers/ distributors/Bulk Consumers of the goods are responsible and accountable to make sure its whole disposal at the give up of its life cycle. R2 PROMISE – Responsible Recycling Producer Responsibility Organization for Management, Information & Support for E-waste disposal.
We underwrite the implementation of EPR scheme on behalf of the producers. We provide manufacturers, services essential to fulfill their statutory, criminal and social responsibilities for E-waste recycling. R2 PROMISE can implement entire EPR addressing numerous profiles defined below new rules by way of helping to draw up appropriate processes/plans, implement, music and file. Some of the services we provide are:
  • EPR Authorization with EPR planning, Documentation and Approval • Compliance Services as in line with the brand new e-waste management guidelines.
  • EPR framework design & Implementation • End to end e-waste control from collection to recycling of waste • Documentation for statutory, criminal and social responsibilities & filling • In the sector of waste management, prolonged producer duty (EPR) is a strategy to add all of the environmental expenses related to a product at some point of the product lifestyles cycle to the market fee of that product.[1] Extended manufacturer obligation legislation is a driving force at the back of the adoption of re-manufacturing initiatives because it “specializes in the cease-of-use remedy of consumer products and has the primary intention to increase the amount and degree of product recovery and to limit the environmental impact of waste materials”.
  • The concept was first formally introduced in Sweden through Thomas Individualist during a 1990 record to the Swedish Ministry of the Environment. In subsequent reports prepared for the Ministry, the subsequent definition emerged: “[EPR] is an environmental protection approach to achieve an environmental objective of a decreased overall environmental impact of a product, by making the producer of the product responsible for the whole existence-cycle of the product and specially for the take-lower back, recycling and very last disposal EPR makes use of monetary incentives to encourage manufacturers to design environmentally friendly products via holding manufacturers answerable for the costs of coping with their merchandise at quit of lifestyles.
This policy approach differs from product stewardship, which shares responsibility throughout the chain of custody of a product,[5] in that it attempts to relieve local governments of the charges of dealing with positive priority products by requiring manufacturers to internalize the price of recycling inside the product charge. EPR is primarily based on the precept that producers (usually logo owners) have the best manipulate over product design and advertising and feature the greatest capacity and duty to lessen toxicity and waste. EPR may additionally take the shape of a reuse, buyback, or recycling program. The producer might also also select to delegate this responsibility to a 3rd party, a so-referred to as producer obligation organization (PRO), that’s paid by means of the producer for used-product management. In this way, EPR shifts the requirement for waste management from government to nonpublic industry, obliging manufacturers, importers